-->
The first to me is this whole “no pre-existing conditions” piece. As you may know, if you’ve ever looked into purchasing health insurance yourself, a middle-aged person who has diabetes would have been more likely to be denied coverage (or charged much, much more) than a young, healthy 20-something. In a similar vein, there used to be caps/limits on how much insurance companies would cover services/medicines for people with chronic conditions that the companies feel are too expensive to cover – like cancer, heart disease, diabetes, hemophilia, mental illness. Seems a little counter-intuitive if we’re really trying to protect the sick (that rely on this continued care), no? Anyways, that is all actually gone now. Under the ACA, insurance companies that participate in the health care exchanges must only use age, where you live, and whether or not you smoke to determine health insurance prices. They also cannot deny or charge exorbitant rates to those who have a “pre-existing condition” like this.
You might have
heard President Obama use the phrase, “health
care is a human right.” in recent days to demonstrate his argument against
defunding Health Care Reform. Even
though this less-than-perfect Health Care Reform begins today in spite of the
government shutdown, what really grates is to hear this phrase being used now,
when the very value of health care as a human right was ignored the President
and the other architects of the Affordable Care Act when they threw out
single-payer health care (an option for really nobody to go without
health care) as a viable option for the people of the United States.
While the
single-payer health care movement does push on, continuing our 100+ year
journey, what we are left with in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) will be
implemented today, October 1st, 2013.
As I mentioned
earlier, the law is certainly less-than-perfect, especially because all it
essentially does is increase profits for morally bankrupt health insurance
companies. However, since we are
moving forward, I’ve looked a bit more into the details of the ACA, and
realized there are actually some pretty exciting things packed in which are
worth discussing.
The first to me is this whole “no pre-existing conditions” piece. As you may know, if you’ve ever looked into purchasing health insurance yourself, a middle-aged person who has diabetes would have been more likely to be denied coverage (or charged much, much more) than a young, healthy 20-something. In a similar vein, there used to be caps/limits on how much insurance companies would cover services/medicines for people with chronic conditions that the companies feel are too expensive to cover – like cancer, heart disease, diabetes, hemophilia, mental illness. Seems a little counter-intuitive if we’re really trying to protect the sick (that rely on this continued care), no? Anyways, that is all actually gone now. Under the ACA, insurance companies that participate in the health care exchanges must only use age, where you live, and whether or not you smoke to determine health insurance prices. They also cannot deny or charge exorbitant rates to those who have a “pre-existing condition” like this.
Finally, again
on a related note, health insurance companies in the Exchange cannot charge a
“co pay” for preventive services like mammograms, colon cancer screening,
glucose testing, etc. This is huge news for the South Asian community, where we
are 7 times more
likely to have diabetes than others in the US, and cardiovascular health,
HIV/AIDS, breast and cervical cancer screening rates remain too low, mostly due
to an
inability to pay/lack of insurance coverage for these preventive services.
It’s actually
embarrassing that this advancement is only coming now, but picking up on the
thread of “pre-existing conditions,” guess what isn’t a pre-existing condition
anymore under the ACA? Being a WOMAN. Yup, us women of “child bearing age”
would routinely and very expectably be charged a higher monthly premium than
men, all other things equal. While
I suspect we’ll get no more than a “big whoop” from eco-feminists like Vandana
Shiva for this ‘advancement,’ hey, we’re moving forward! Yay. So, women cannot be charged more than men. And of course, since our primary
function continues to be defined by society as baby-makers -- insurance
companies have to cover maternity care and breast-feeding supplies. Now, if we could only get insurance
companies to have to cover the cost of other crucial things women need – such
as interpretation services and translated notices, sex reassignment surgery, and
care for our immigrant sisters who have been in the country less than 5 years
or are undocumented.
Since I
mentioned interpretation and translation in the last paragraph, let me also
acknowledge that it is a great thing that the ACA actually mentions cultural and linguistic competence,
something many of us have jumped up and down about for years, in a few
different areas – including providing funding for cultural competence training,
and, excitingly, community health navigators. However,
we have yet to see how this will all shake out – will all states’ health
care exchanges follow NY’s example and reimburse providers for the cost of
interpretation and translation?
That is the only way (sadly) to get medical providers to really expand
this life-sustaining service. Will
there be standards issued/incentives provided for bilingual health navigators
for immigrant communities?
Will they actually lower the required threshold before having to
translate health insurance notices (which, admittedly, are hard to understand
as a native English speaker) to a more realistic level (currently, 25% of the
enrollees need to speak the same non-English language in order for the company
to translate their appeals notices into that language)?
Also, since I
mentioned immigrants in the paragraph before last, let me just yell and scream
again in advance of anybody saying that the ACA ensures nobody will be left
uninsured. Arrrrrghhh!! First of all: factually incorrect
on many levels. 30 million people
in the US will still be left uninsured.
And to add insult to injury, guess
who subsidizes the cost of public health programs YET is not allowed to receive
health care services through the very programs they pay for? Yep, IMMIGRANTS. For all ye
liberals who like to drone on about how far we’ve come with the ACA, I ask one
simple favor of you today: try not to get too excited yet. Immigrants make it possible for
Americans’ health care costs to be covered -- $10 billion (yes, that’s a “B”)
was paid into the Medicare Hospital Insurance Trust Fund in 2009 by
noncitizens. Many of my friends
who worked on the passage of the ACA work primarily with immigrant communities,
and yet this point is not raised nearly as much as it needs to be, I feel. Even though the famed “health care
exchanges” are supposed to function as a marketplace where anybody can use
their own hard-earned money to purchase a health insurance plan, the marketplace will not accept the dollars
of undocumented folks and folks who have papers but immigrated within the last
5 years. Remember how I mentioned
the high rates of cardiovascular disease and disturbingly low rates of
screening for these and other conditions?
It’s not just South Asian immigrant communities that don’t screen for
these. Immigrant communities in
general don’t get these tests done – and therefore end up having these chronic
conditions get worse and worse, and therefore
end up in the emergency room or at a point of no return which costs WAY TOO MUCH
to care for – so much so that I know one too many immigrant families who have
been bankrupted in the process of paying for cancer treatment, etc. Well, yes, the fact that insurance
companies charged for preventive services before was a factor contributing to
this devastation, as was caps on services – both of which, thankfully, have
been addressed by the ACA, sure.
But the other factor is immigration status itself. This has NOT been addressed by the
ACA. Maybe insurance companies
won’t charge co-pays and won’t have caps on services, but what if you’re not
even allowed to purchase the bloody insurance plan?! Yes, I know there is Emergency Medicaid. But don’t even get me started about the
hoops one has to go through to get this program to cover cost of care for
needed services like chemotherapy and radiation.
There are a few things
to feel proud of, yes. The fact
that Medicaid coverage has been expanded in most states, that you can receive tax subsidies to help
with the cost of health care premiums under the exchanges, that small
businesses and non-profits (with under 25 employees with average wages less
than $50K) such as Many Languages One Voice, which offers full insurance
coverage to its employees, can get a tax credit, that health insurance
companies participating in the exchanges cannot discriminate based on sexual
orientation or gender identity (holding my breath to see how this actually gets
practiced by providers), and that dental services for kids will be offered through
the exchange marketplace.
However,
I am saving my glitter and fanfare for the day we as a country can truly start to
say we care about ALL our residents’ (yes, that includes IMMIGRANTS) health – the day we truly realize health care as
a human right: the day when single-payer health
care is a reality– which sadly, is not today, October 1st, 2013.
No comments:
Post a Comment